Military

Military

About three-quarters of the 1.4 million active duty military members are eligible to vote absentee with special protections because they're stationed away from their voting residence. FVAP compiles data on military voting from administrative records of absentee ballot requests and vote histories, as well from the Post-Election Voting Surveys of Active Duty Military (PEVS-ADM), State Election Officials (PEVS-SEO), and Voting Assistance Officers (PEVS-VAO).


Among active duty military members, election interest and voting rates tend to be lower during midterm election years and higher during presidential election years.

Image Military Voter Registration, Participation, and Interest

Military Voter Registration, Participation, Interest, click here to see interactive version

 

Comparing the Military and Civilian Populations

It is difficult to compare the voter registration and participation rates of U.S. military and civilians as their demographic composition differs in many ways, including age, gender, education, and mobility. FVAP controls for these demographics by comparing registration and participation rates among military members with civilians who most closely resemble the military population.


FVAP differentiates between the military and civilian populations in two ways:

  • Comparing a sample of military voters to a sample of the civilian voting-age population (CVAP) with demographic and
    geographic data. The CVAP is employed native and naturalized U.S. citizens who are 18 years of age or older and living in
    the U.S. — the U.S. Census Bureau's standard measure for voting statistics.
  •  Adjusting the CVAP sample with a statistical model so it more closely aligns with the demographics of the military sample
    for a more accurate comparison of military and civilian voting participation rates.


Image Military and Civilian Voting Registration and Participation Comparisons.

 

Compared to the civilian population, a lower percentage of active duty military have voted in recent federal elections. FVAP uses military members' responses to survey questions to divide this voting gap into an obstacles gap and a residual gap. Obstacles are factors that impede the speed at which voters receive and transmit election materials — voter registration forms, ballot requests, and ballots themselves.

  • Vote Rate: The percentage of the voting age population that submitted a ballot and had a vote recorded in state vote history
    records.
  • Obstacles Gap: The percentage of overseas citizens who wanted or tried to vote but were unsuccessful. They may have been
    helped by voter education, state legislative changes, or improved communication with election offices.
  • Residual Gap: The percentage of overseas citizens who did not vote because of factors that cannot be resolved within the voting process, such as lack of interest or motivation.

 

Characteristics of Military Voters

FVAP's Post-Election Survey of Active Duty Military (PEVS-ADM) reveals insights into what military voters know about voting, how they feel about it, and the steps they take.

Image of Military Voters Attitudes, Experience and Knowledge

 

Image Military-Voters Ballot-Receipt-and-Return

 

Image Military Voter Awareness and Use of Voting Assistance Resources

 

Additional Research and Reports

State of the Military Voter provides the most current data on this important voting bloc. FVAP's annual Reports to Congress and technical reports on the biennial Post-Election Voting Survey of Active Duty Military (PEVS-ADM) also address military voting. Research Notes explore specific aspects of military voting in greater depth.

Name Election Year Document Type
Measuring Obstacles to Voting for UOCAVA ADM: Introducing the UOCAVA Gap 2010-2016 Research Note
The Effects of the 2010 FVAP Website Redesign on Voting in the Active Duty Military Population 2008-2012 Research Note
2022 Post-Election Report to Congress 2022 RTC
Active Duty Military Post-Election Voting Survey: Technical Report 2020 2020 Report
2020 Post-Election Report to Congress 2020 RTC
2018 Post-Election Report to Congress 2018 RTC
Active Duty Military Post-Election Voting Survey: Technical Report 2018 2018 Report
2016 Post-Election Report to Congress 2016 RTC
Active Duty Military Post-Election Voting Survey: Technical Report 2016 2016 Report
Data Standardization and the Impact of Ballot Transmission Timing and Mode on UOCAVA Voting 2016 Research Note
Data Standardization and the Impact of Ballot Transmission Timing and Mode on UOCAVA Voting 2016 Research Note Summary
2014 Post-Election Report to Congress 2014 RTC
Active Duty Military Post-Election Voting Survey: Technical Report 2014 2014 Report
Registration and Voting Participation Differences Between the Active
Duty Military and Citizen Voting Age Populations in the 2014 Election
2014 Research Note
2012 Post-Election Report to Congress 2012 RTC
Active Duty Military Post-Election Voting Survey: Technical Report 2012 2012 Report
Assessing the Impact of FVAP Resources 2012 Research Note
Registration and Voting Participation Differences Between the Active Duty 2012 Research Note
The Effects of Spouses on Voting in the Active Duty Military Population 2012 Research Note